• News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube
Threads
Submit Your Content
Red Dead Redemption 3 is 'unnecessary', fans argue

Home> News

Published 13:20 18 Oct 2023 GMT+1

Red Dead Redemption 3 is 'unnecessary', fans argue

Believe it or not, some fans are hoping that Rockstar Games pass on a potential Red Dead Redemption 3.

Kate Harrold

Kate Harrold

While you might be thinking that Red Dead Redemption fans are clamouring for a third instalment, it’s certainly not a universally agreed upon wish. In fact, some fans controversially think that Rockstar Games should just leave the franchise as it is.

It’s no secret that many fans have hailed Red Dead Redemption 2 as being one of the best-looking games out there and one of the best open-worlds. It does beg the question, could Rockstar Games possibly top it? Assumedly, we will end up getting a Red Dead Redemption 3. I can hardly see Rockstar abandoning what is one of the most celebrated gaming franchises. That being said, we have no official news on such a game. Then again, Rockstar is busy cooking up GTA VI. John Marston’s actor did drop a juicy tease but some fans are arguing that Red Dead 3 simply isn’t needed.

Take a look at our favourite Red Dead Redemption 2 wins and fails below.

Reddit user ayyLumao wrote, “Unpopular opinion: I think Red Dead Redemption 3 is entirely unnecessary and shouldn't be made. Look, I love Red Dead. Both Redemption games are among my favourite games of all time, and I think they're among the best games ever made, however, we don't need more. The story wrapped up very nicely in my opinion and I don't think another prequel about Dutch and Hosea, or Uncle and his Lumbago would be a good idea. Same with a sequel about Jack, especially since WW1 started in the same year that RDR1 ended.”

They continued, “I think the way to go for another Red Dead would be Red Dead 4, whether that's ‘Red Dead Revolution’ or ‘Red Dead Raving Rabbids’, I don't want Redemption to be ruined by an overly milked story spanning backwards across eight different games or something.”

Advert

Surprisingly, this user wasn’t alone. “I agree. I think if they craft a phenomenal new story, and enough technological improvements are made to make some really compelling new gameplay, I'd be down. But otherwise, 1 and 2 are phenomenal and don't really need revisiting,” Calibretto9 added, while DC1919 said, “Same. I think people need to understand that some games hold a snapshot in time. RDR2 will always be regarded as one of the best games ever made and I think making sequels dilutes that.” Which side of the fence do you sit on?

Featured Image Credit: Rockstar Games

Topics: Red Dead Redemption, Rockstar Games, Red Dead Redemption 2

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

4 hours ago
5 hours ago
7 hours ago
9 hours ago
  • 4 hours ago

    Red Dead Redemption 2 free download adds a thrilling new open-world challenge

    I fought the law

    News
  • 5 hours ago

    Steam just added 4 more free games in latest giveaway

    PC players are in for yet another treat courtesy of Steam

    News
  • 7 hours ago

    Battlefield meets Dark Souls in new RPG unlike anything you’ve seen before

    You can shoot guns on top of a wolf?! Game of the year.

    News
  • 9 hours ago

    The Elder Scrolls 6 leaked trailer has fans losing their minds

    The hype is worth the wait

    News
  • Red Dead Redemption 3 tease has fans pretty torn
  • Red Dead Redemption announcement leaves fans torn
  • Red Dead Redemption 3 to leave out iconic character: ‘his story has been told’
  • Red Dead Redemption 2 fans furious over new official DLC