• News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube
Threads
Submit Your Content
Starfield called 'drastic step back' from Skyrim and Fallout by angry fans

Home> News> Platform> Xbox

Published 15:49 11 Sep 2023 GMT+1

Starfield called 'drastic step back' from Skyrim and Fallout by angry fans

One YouTuber has said that Starfield is a "drastic step back" when compared to Skyrim and Fallout.

Kate Harrold

Kate Harrold

Starfield continues to divide. I’m sure if your social media feed is anything like mine, opinions alternate between ‘this game is incredible’ and ‘this game is underwhelming’ with every successive tweet.

Personally, I’m a big fan of the game. In our 10 star review, I wrote, “Every now and then, a new game comes along that changes our perception of what the industry is capable of. Starfield is that game. This is beyond what we’ve come to know an open-world to be. Bethesda has created a universe that, despite its vast scale, maintains interest and an impressive attention to detail throughout.” Other players have taken issue with the game’s immersion though, particularly when it comes to fast travel and loading screens. Some are even now referring to Starfield as being a “drastic step back” from Skyrim and Fallout.

Take a look at our video review of Starfield review.

The dichotomy continues because while some players berate the game, it’s also been announced to be Bethesda’s biggest launch of all-time. As reported by Dexerto, YouTuber NakeyJakey recently shared his thoughts on Starfield’s “utterly dreadful” exploration. On Twitter, he wrote, “Twenty five hours in and exploration in Starfield is utterly dreadful. You land on a planet, it generates a bunch of locations (most of them like 400 metres away, if not more) and you WALK.”

Advert

He continued, “There is no ship to fly, there is no rover to drive. There’s not even a space horse to mount to keep traversal engaging. You mindlessly sprint and boost jump [through] a soulless field of nothing to reach a copy and pasted destination that very rarely feels worth the effort. This is such a drastic step back from the amazing sense of exploration and wonder that Skyrim and Fallout 4 inspired, it truly baffles me.”

Hm. I’ll add that you can fast travel to points of interest on a planet if you don’t want to walk / jetpack. It’s also clear that NakeyJakey is talking about the game’s procedurally-generated planets, which somewhat doesn’t add into the picture that there are also 100 human-generated planets filled with complex, unique points of interest to explore. I don’t see the Starfield divide ending anytime soon.

Featured Image Credit: Bethesda

Topics: Starfield, Bethesda, PC, Xbox

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

6 hours ago
7 hours ago
8 hours ago
9 hours ago
  • 6 hours ago

    GTA 6 framerate roasted by frustrated fans

    30fps in this day and age just ain't gonna cut it

    News
  • 7 hours ago

    Cyberpunk 2077 players are still overlooking a significant part of the map

    Was this always there?

    News
  • 8 hours ago

    PlayStation gamers ‘worried’ about Xbox’s newly announced console

    Should Sony be worried?

    News
  • 9 hours ago

    PS5 users gifted free new-gen update for one of 2017's best games

    Finally, PS5 is getting this update

    News
  • Starfield fans furious over latest update from Xbox
  • Star Wars: Galactic Civil War is a hefty RPG with major Fallout vibes
  • Fallout 4 stunning new-gen remaster will tempt you back to the wasteland
  • Fallout 2 remake teaser leaves fans divided, and we get it