• News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube
Threads
Submit Your Content
Harry Potter fans torn over Voldemort recasting we all missed
Home>News>TV and Film>Harry Potter
Published 12:13 3 Apr 2025 GMT+1

Harry Potter fans torn over Voldemort recasting we all missed

Was he the better Voldemort?

Dan Lipscombe

Dan Lipscombe

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures

Topics: Harry Potter, TV And Film, Warner Bros

Advert

Advert

Advert

The character of Voldemort was brilliantly brought to life by the incomparable Ralph Fiennes, bringing a great energy to the villainous role of a genocidal, maniacal wizard.

The actor stepped into the role in the later Harry Potter films when old Voldemort finally escaped his life as just a head, then snake, and into his slit-nosed glory.

Voldemort is at his most powerful in the final films, and Fiennes does a great job being the villain.

Advert

While fans celebrate this portrayal of the dark lord, many of us forget that another actor had played Voldemort in the earliest films, when he was just a CGI entity.

That actor was Richard Bremmer, who never really gets a lot of recognition for launching the villain into the realms of film.

On Reddit, one fan considers Bremmer’s performance to be superior, saying, “HE was Voldemort. He was frightening, calm, and just you can feel how dark this guy really is.”

They’ve got a point. While Fiennes’ performance was fantastic, it’s clear he was having a brilliant time hamming it up, and giving an over-the-top outing.

On reflection, it’s hard to see Voldemort as menacing as he perhaps should have been, partly due to the family rating, partly due to the way in which Fiennes played him.

As another fan notes, “I've always thought this. Fiennes' Voldemort (or, rather, presumably how he was directed as Voldemort) was too angry for me. Voldemort in the books is truly chilling, terrifying, because he is generally so calm and cold. He doesn't have to be angry to kill - it's nothing to him.”

In reply, one Redditor agrees, saying, “I thought Voldemort in the books was more of a psychopath, until he finally loses it. The movies removed that tension for me.”

Perhaps the film’s crew weren’t sure the adaptations would be a success and when they saw the box office blow up, they called in Fiennes and went in a new direction.

It would have been great to see another version, but I guess we’ll get that with the HBO show soon.

Choose your content:

2 hours ago
7 hours ago
8 hours ago
  • 505 Games
    2 hours ago

    PlayStation Plus 40-Hour Freebie Is A Worthy Bloodborne Follow-Up

    Love Bloodborne? Then you’ll love this!

    News
  • Square Enix
    7 hours ago

    Fan-favourite Final Fantasy Set For Huge DLC Two Decades After Release

    A recent resurgence in players has left the developers scrambling to add more content

    News
  • David Paul Morris/Getty Images
    8 hours ago

    Xbox 360 Returns In New Free Download For PC Users

    One software developer has brought the Xbox 360 back in an unexpected way.

    News
  • THQ Nordic
    8 hours ago

    Stuff Your Elder Scrolls, This Stunning Action RPG Arrives Next Week And Is Everything We Needed

    A short gameplay trailer was all we needed to be sold for this magnificent, sword-wielding cave crawler

    News
  • Harry Potter TV Series Suffers First Recast As Season 2 Filming Underway
  • Harry Potter Reboot Auditioning Female Voldemort, Says Insider
  • Harry Potter Reboot's 'Lady Voldemort' May Have Been Cast
  • Hogwarts Legacy 2 Void Filled By New Harry Potter 'Defend Hogwarts' Game