• News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube
Threads
Submit Your Content
Harry Potter fans torn over Voldemort recasting we all missed

Home> News> TV and Film> Harry Potter

Published 12:13 3 Apr 2025 GMT+1

Harry Potter fans torn over Voldemort recasting we all missed

Was he the better Voldemort?

Dan Lipscombe

Dan Lipscombe

The character of Voldemort was brilliantly brought to life by the incomparable Ralph Fiennes, bringing a great energy to the villainous role of a genocidal, maniacal wizard.

The actor stepped into the role in the later Harry Potter films when old Voldemort finally escaped his life as just a head, then snake, and into his slit-nosed glory.

Voldemort is at his most powerful in the final films, and Fiennes does a great job being the villain.

While fans celebrate this portrayal of the dark lord, many of us forget that another actor had played Voldemort in the earliest films, when he was just a CGI entity.

Advert

That actor was Richard Bremmer, who never really gets a lot of recognition for launching the villain into the realms of film.

On Reddit, one fan considers Bremmer’s performance to be superior, saying, “HE was Voldemort. He was frightening, calm, and just you can feel how dark this guy really is.”

They’ve got a point. While Fiennes’ performance was fantastic, it’s clear he was having a brilliant time hamming it up, and giving an over-the-top outing.

On reflection, it’s hard to see Voldemort as menacing as he perhaps should have been, partly due to the family rating, partly due to the way in which Fiennes played him.

Advert

As another fan notes, “I've always thought this. Fiennes' Voldemort (or, rather, presumably how he was directed as Voldemort) was too angry for me. Voldemort in the books is truly chilling, terrifying, because he is generally so calm and cold. He doesn't have to be angry to kill - it's nothing to him.”

In reply, one Redditor agrees, saying, “I thought Voldemort in the books was more of a psychopath, until he finally loses it. The movies removed that tension for me.”

Perhaps the film’s crew weren’t sure the adaptations would be a success and when they saw the box office blow up, they called in Fiennes and went in a new direction.

It would have been great to see another version, but I guess we’ll get that with the HBO show soon.

Featured Image Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures

Topics: Harry Potter, TV And Film, Warner Bros

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

13 mins ago
7 hours ago
8 hours ago
  • 13 mins ago

    The Elder Scrolls 6 announcement has fans in disbelief

    I’m not surprised, just disappointed

    News
  • 7 hours ago

    Starfield meets Valheim in this free Steam download

    Viking and sci-fi fans, rejoice!

    News
  • 8 hours ago

    Zelda fans, you need to check out this Steam freebie

    This has old-school vibes

    News
  • 8 hours ago

    Intergalactic gets release window update, brace yourselves

    Possible bigger reveal soon?

    News
  • Harry Potter fans in love with leaked Molly Weasley casting, and we see the vision
  • Harry Potter fans united over Voldemort prequel
  • Harry Potter HBO series officially casts The Malfoys
  • OG Harry Potter star officially returning for Cursed Child sequel