• News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube
Threads
Submit Your Content
Marvel confirms why they recast MCU Hulk, and it's pretty brutal

Home> News> TV and Film> Marvel

Published 15:28 20 Dec 2024 GMT

Marvel confirms why they recast MCU Hulk, and it's pretty brutal

Disney's "decision is definitely not one based on monetary factors," according to Feige

Lewis Parker

Lewis Parker

Don’t freak out; Mark Ruffalo is still The Hulk. That’s not the recasting we’re here to explain.

Although you’d be forgiven for assuming we were talking about Ruffalo’s take on the character, as the last solo Hulk MCU film is well over 16 years old at this point.

Disney’s Marvel films have seen a few recastings over the years, such as Terrence Howard getting recast in favour of Don Cheadle for Iron Man 2, but Edward Norton’s replacement as Bruce Banner following the release of The Incredible Hulk is probably the most high-profile of them all.

So why did Norton get replaced? Probably because, by the sounds of things, he was a bit of a pain to work with.

Advert

As explained in Joanna Robinson's book, MCU: The Reign of Marvel Studios, this rule even spawned its own “policy” at Disney.

Here’s the excerpt: “We have a no-asshole policy on our movies,” one Marvel performer summarized. Craig Kyle, who joined Marvel Studios as a producer back in the days of the kite factory, agreed: 'It's a great policy."

There’s a little more to it however, as (following the release of The Incredible Hulk) Kevin Feige explained to HitFix back in 2010.

“We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title role of Bruce Banner in The Avengers,” he told the publication, “Our decision is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our other talented cast members.”

“The Avengers demands players who thrive working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, Samuel, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the iconic role in the coming weeks.”

Damn, Feige. You don’t even have to read the lines to feel the sass behind his words, especially when he explicitly states that it wasn’t “based on monetary factors.”

Does make you wonder how different the MCU would have been if Norton stuck around though. Maybe they’d have kept the awful bowl cut they gave The Hulk for longer too.

Featured Image Credit: Disney

Topics: Disney, Marvel, MCU, Avengers

Advert

Advert

Advert

  • MCU fans in love with new Fantastic Four teaser
  • MCU fans torn over major X-Men casting update
  • MCU fans seriously torn over surprise movie announcement
  • Marvel fans praise ’flawless’ Iron Man MCU recast as ‘best way’ to do it

Choose your content:

8 mins ago
an hour ago
  • CD Projekt Red
    8 mins ago

    The Witcher 4 Hopefuls Prepare For Reveal As CDPR Makes Quiet Update

    Toss a coin to your Witcher sequel

    News
  • Xbox Game Studios
    an hour ago

    Starfield New DLC Expansion Release Window Splits Gamers

    What's this all leading to?

    News
  • Dear Villagers
    an hour ago

    The Last of Us–Inspired RPG With Witcher-Style Open World Gets Release Date, Now PS5 Exclusive

    A female knight? Yes please

    News
  • The Pokémon Company
    an hour ago

    Pokémon Officially Joins Universal Studios, Early Details Tease Something Magical

    "Hyper-realistic" sounds oddly concerning though...

    News