• News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube
Threads
Submit Your Content
Lord of the Rings Answers Why Gollum Never Took One Ring To Sauron

Home> News

Published 13:51 26 Oct 2025 GMT

Lord of the Rings Answers Why Gollum Never Took One Ring To Sauron

Just let him have the precious

James Lynch

James Lynch

Anybody who tries to tell me that The Lord of the Rings is anything other than the greatest fantasy series of all time is in for one hell of an argument, and I mean that for both the books and the film trilogy in their own individual mediums.

The work of author J.R.R Tolkien is known for the exceptional depth of its lore and the movies do a pretty impressive job of translating that across, but the restricted runtime does leave some questions open, when they may not have been in the books.

This has led to countless discussions amongst fans about why things are the way that they are, with the most famous example probably being why the Fellowship didn't take the Eagles to Mordor (if anyone asks me that again I'm going to explode).

Over on Reddit, one user who has currently only consumed The Lord of the Rings via the films, took to the site to ask "book nerds" why Gollum didn't succumb to the ring's desires during the time he owned it and simply take it to Sauron himself.

An Answer in Two Layers

New Line Cinema
New Line Cinema

Advert

As the top comment explains, the answer is twofold. The first relates to the fact that Tolkien hadn't really decided what the ring was going to be when he introduced it and Gollum in the Hobbit (which he wrote long before The Lord of the Rings). Since then, he also came up with an acceptable reason for the lore, as the top comment explains, "Out of context answer: Tolkien hadn't decided on the Ring being anything more than an invisibility ring when he introduced it and Gollum in The Hobbit."

"Lore answer: To my knowledge, it was partially because Sauron's forces were still being built up. He didn't want the Ring back until he had the strength to crush the West with relative ease."

So whilst Tolkien did have to come up with something that made sense after the shiny trinket he wrote about in The Hobbit became the most important thing in the entirety of Middle-earth, it does at least make a lot of sense.

Why would Sauron want to come into possession of the ring when he's too weak to defend it, particularly with the attention of the White Council drawn towards his efforts in Dol Guldur.

Advert

No, it's much better that it remains lost in relative safety, returning to him when the moment is just right.

Featured Image Credit: New Line Cinema

Topics: Reddit

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

3 mins ago
an hour ago
2 hours ago
  • Massive Entertainment/Ubisoft
    3 mins ago

    Nintendo Switch Freebie Is Red Dead Redemption Meets GTA

    One of the best games on the Switch

    News
  • Albert L. Ortega/WireImage
    an hour ago

    Marvel Star Rumoured To Return To MCU After 6 Years

    One of the OG characters in the MCU

    News
  • XD
    2 hours ago

    Animal Crossing Inspired Life Sim Free To Enjoy For A Limited Time

    It's all very cute

    News
  • RocketWerkz
    2 hours ago

    Starfield Meets Valheim In New PS5 Open-World Release

    Console players can soon get in on the action

    News
  • Lord Of The Rings finally explains why Gollum never wore the One Ring
  • Lord Of The Rings explains why Gollum never went after Bilbo for The Ring
  • Lord Of The Rings fans ‘depressed’ after learning why Gollum never wore the Ring
  • Lord of the Rings Hit Game Announces Major Expansion